Theorem proving using lazy proof explication

C Flanagan, R Joshi, X Ou, JB Saxe - … , CAV 2003, Boulder, CO, USA, July …, 2003 - Springer
Many verification problems reduce to proving the validity of formulas involving both
propositional connectives and domain-specific functions and predicates. This paper …

Strong extension-free proof systems

MJH Heule, B Kiesl, A Biere - Journal of Automated Reasoning, 2020 - Springer
We introduce proof systems for propositional logic that admit short proofs of hard formulas as
well as the succinct expression of most techniques used by modern SAT solvers. Our proof …

Efficient, verified checking of propositional proofs

M Heule, W Hunt, M Kaufmann, N Wetzler - Interactive Theorem Proving …, 2017 - Springer
Satisfiability (SAT) solvers—and software in general—sometimes have serious bugs. We
mitigate these effects by validating the results. Today's SAT solvers emit proofs that can be …

PVS: A prototype verification system

S Owre, JM Rushby, N Shankar - International Conference on Automated …, 1992 - Springer
PVS is a prototype system for writing specifications and constructing proofs. Its development
has been shaped by our experiences studying or using several other systems 1 and …

CVC Lite: A new implementation of the cooperating validity checker: Category B

C Barrett, S Berezin - … : 16th International Conference, CAV 2004, Boston …, 2004 - Springer
We describe a tool called CVC Lite (CVCL), an automated theorem prover for formulas in a
union of first-order theories. CVCL supports a set of theories which are useful in verification …

Efficient certified RAT verification

L Cruz-Filipe, MJH Heule, WA Hunt… - … Deduction–CADE 26 …, 2017 - Springer
Clausal proofs have become a popular approach to validate the results of SAT solvers.
However, validating clausal proofs in the most widely supported format (DRAT) is expensive …

Checking satisfiability of first-order formulas by incremental translation to SAT

CW Barrett, DL Dill, A Stump - … , CAV 2002 Copenhagen, Denmark, July 27 …, 2002 - Springer
In the past few years, general-purpose propositional satisfiability (SAT) solvers have
improved dramatically in performance and have been used to tackle many new problems. It …

[PDF][PDF] Extracting (Easily) Checkable Proofs from a Satisfiability Solver that Employs both Preorder and Postorder Resolution.

A Van Gelder - AI&M, 2002 - users.soe.ucsc.edu
In many applications the desired outcome of satisfiability checking is that the formula is
unsatisfiable: A satisfying assignment essentially exhibits a bug and unsatisfiability implies a …

Abstraction-based satisfiability solving of Presburger arithmetic

D Kroening, J Ouaknine, SA Seshia… - … Aided Verification: 16th …, 2004 - Springer
We present a new abstraction-based framework for deciding satisfiability of quantifier-free
Presburger arithmetic formulas. Given a Presburger formula φ, our algorithm invokes a SAT …

DRAT-trim: Efficient checking and trimming using expressive clausal proofs

N Wetzler, MJH Heule, WA Hunt Jr - International Conference on Theory …, 2014 - Springer
The DRAT-trim tool is a satisfiability proof checker based on the new DRAT proof format.
Unlike its predecessor, DRUP-trim, all presently known SAT solving and preprocessing …