Extending the PRISMA statement to equity-focused systematic reviews (PRISMA-E 2012): explanation and elaboration
Background The promotion of health equity, the absence of avoidable and unfair differences
in health outcomes, is a global imperative. Systematic reviews are an important source of …
in health outcomes, is a global imperative. Systematic reviews are an important source of …
[HTML][HTML] Extending the PRISMA statement to equity-focused systematic reviews (PRISMA-E 2012): explanation and elaboration
Background The promotion of health equity, the absence of avoidable and unfair differences
in health outcomes, is a global imperative. Systematic reviews are an important source of …
in health outcomes, is a global imperative. Systematic reviews are an important source of …
PRISMA-Equity 2012 extension: reporting guidelines for systematic reviews with a focus on health equity
PRISMA-Equity 2012 Extension: Reporting Guidelines for Systematic Reviews with a Focus on
Health Equity | PLOS Medicine Skip to main content Advertisement PLOS Medicine Browse …
Health Equity | PLOS Medicine Skip to main content Advertisement PLOS Medicine Browse …
Testing the PRISMA-Equity 2012 reporting guideline: the perspectives of systematic review authors
Reporting guidelines can be used to encourage standardised and comprehensive reporting
of health research. In light of the global commitment to health equity, we have previously …
of health research. In light of the global commitment to health equity, we have previously …
Health equity: evidence synthesis and knowledge translation methods
Abstract Background At the Rio Summit in 2011 on Social Determinants of Health, the global
community recognized a pressing need to take action on reducing health inequities. This …
community recognized a pressing need to take action on reducing health inequities. This …
How effects on health equity are assessed in systematic reviews of interventions
Background Enhancing health equity is endorsed in the Sustainable Development Goals.
The failure of systematic reviews to consider potential differences in effects across equity …
The failure of systematic reviews to consider potential differences in effects across equity …
Does consideration and assessment of effects on health equity affect the conclusions of systematic reviews? A methodology study
V Welch, M Petticrew, E Ueffing, M Benkhalti Jandu… - PLoS …, 2012 - journals.plos.org
Introduction Tackling health inequities both within and between countries remains high on
the agenda of international organizations including the World Health Organization and local …
the agenda of international organizations including the World Health Organization and local …
[PDF][PDF] Extensión PRISMA-Equidad 2012: guías para la escritura y la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas enfocadas en la equidad en salud
There is a global imperative to tackle national and international health inequities-defined as
unfair and avoidable differences in health. One step in reaching this goal is to improve the …
unfair and avoidable differences in health. One step in reaching this goal is to improve the …
Methods used to conceptualize dimensions of health equity impacts of public health interventions in systematic reviews
Objectives Our aims were to, first, identify and summarize the use of methods, frameworks,
and tools as a conceptual basis for investigating dimensions of equity impacts of public …
and tools as a conceptual basis for investigating dimensions of equity impacts of public …
Protocol for the development of a CONSORT-equity guideline to improve reporting of health equity in randomized trials
Background Health equity concerns the absence of avoidable and unfair differences in
health. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) can provide evidence about the impact of an …
health. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) can provide evidence about the impact of an …