The affective harm account (AHA) of moral judgment: Reconciling cognition and affect, dyadic morality and disgust, harm and purity.

K Gray, JK MacCormack, T Henry, E Banks… - Journal of Personality …, 2022 - psycnet.apa.org
Moral psychology has long debated whether moral judgment is rooted in harm versus affect.
We reconcile this debate with the affective harm account (AHA) of moral judgment. The AHA …

[PDF][PDF] The Affective Harm Account (AHA) of Moral Judgment: Reconciling Cognition and Affect, Dyadic Morality and Disgust, Harm and Purity

K Gray, JK MacCormack, T Henry, E Banks, C Schein… - researchgate.net
Moral psychology has long debated whether moral judgment is rooted in harm vs. affect. We
reconcile this debate with the Affective Harm Account (AHA) of moral judgment. The AHA …

The affective harm account (AHA) of moral judgment: Reconciling cognition and affect, dyadic morality and disgust, harm and purity

K Gray, JK MacCormack, T Henry… - … of Personality and …, 2022 - dialnet.unirioja.es
Moral psychology has long debated whether moral judgment is rooted in harm versus affect.
We reconcile this debate with the affective harm account (AHA) of moral judgment. The AHA …

The affective harm account (AHA) of moral judgment: Reconciling cognition and affect, dyadic morality and disgust, harm and purity.

K Gray, JK MacCormack, T Henry, E Banks… - Journal of Personality …, 2022 - europepmc.org
Moral psychology has long debated whether moral judgment is rooted in harm versus affect.
We reconcile this debate with the affective harm account (AHA) of moral judgment. The AHA …

The affective harm account (AHA) of moral judgment: Reconciling cognition and affect, dyadic morality and disgust, harm and purity

K Gray, JK MacCormack, T Henry, E Banks, C Schein… - 2022 - pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Moral psychology has long debated whether moral judgment is rooted in harm versus affect.
We reconcile this debate with the affective harm account (AHA) of moral judgment. The AHA …

[PDF][PDF] The Affective Harm Account (AHA) of Moral Judgment: Reconciling Cognition and Affect, Dyadic Morality and Disgust, Harm and Purity

K Gray, JK MacCormack, T Henry, E Banks, C Schein… - deepestbeliefslab.com
Moral psychology has long debated whether moral judgment is rooted in harm vs. affect. We
reconcile this debate with the Affective Harm Account (AHA) of moral judgment. The AHA …

The Affective Harm Account (AHA) of Moral Judgment: Reconciling Cognition and Affect, Dyadic Morality and Disgust, Harm and Purity

K Gray, JK MacCormack, T Henry, E Banks, C Schein… - 2022 - search.proquest.com
Moral psychology has long debated whether moral judgment is rooted in harm versus affect.
We reconcile this debate with the affective harm account (AHA) of moral judgment. The AHA …

The affective harm account (AHA) of moral judgment: Reconciling cognition and affect, dyadic morality and disgust, harm and purity.

K Gray, JK MacCormack, T Henry… - … of Personality and …, 2022 - search.pdh.ebscohost.com
Moral psychology has long debated whether moral judgment is rooted in harm versus affect.
We reconcile this debate with the affective harm account (AHA) of moral judgment. The AHA …

The affective harm account (AHA) of moral judgment: Reconciling cognition and affect, dyadic morality and disgust, harm and purity.

K Gray, JK MacCormack, T Henry, E Banks… - Journal of Personality …, 2022 - psycnet.apa.org
Moral psychology has long debated whether moral judgment is rooted in harm versus affect.
We reconcile this debate with the affective harm account (AHA) of moral judgment. The AHA …