Menage a quoi? Optimal number of peer reviewers

RR Snell - PloS one, 2015 - journals.plos.org
Peer review represents the primary mechanism used by funding agencies to allocate
financial support and by journals to select manuscripts for publication, yet recent Cochrane …

Reviewer recommendation method for scientific research proposals: a case for NSFC

X Liu, X Wang, D Zhu - Scientometrics, 2022 - Springer
Peer review is one of the important procedures to determine which research proposals are
to be funded and to evaluate the quality of scientific research. How to find suitable reviewers …

'Are you siding with a personality or the grant proposal?': observations on how peer review panels function

J Coveney, DL Herbert, K Hill, KE Mow… - Research Integrity and …, 2017 - Springer
Abstract Background In Australia, the peer review process for competitive funding is usually
conducted by a peer review group in conjunction with prior assessment from external …

How to write a research grant proposal

S Bhattacharya, V Saha - Indian journal of medical microbiology, 2023 - Elsevier
Background Research is essential for the advancement of science, technology and
development. Research requires funding and resource allocation. And funding requires the …

Grant application review: the case of transparency

D Gurwitz, E Milanesi, T Koenig - PLoS Biology, 2014 - journals.plos.org
Grant Application Review: The Case of Transparency | PLOS Biology Skip to main content
Advertisement PLOS Biology Browse Current Issue Journal Archive Collections Find and …

The interplay between universities and companies. A case study in the field of 3D Printing

AB Jurado, D Golzio - World Patent Information, 2024 - Elsevier
Understanding the link between research done at universities and the implication for
industrial applications is a recurrent topic in innovation. Non-Patent Literature (NPL) …

Peer-review for selection of oral presentations for conferences: Are we reliable?

M Deveugele, J Silverman - Patient education and counseling, 2017 - Elsevier
Introduction Although peer-review for journal submission, grant-applications and conference
submissions has been called 'a counter-stone of science', and even 'the gold standard for …

Reviewer training for improving grant and journal peer review

JO Hesselberg, TK Dalsbø, H Stromme… - Cochrane Database …, 2023 - cochranelibrary.com
Background Funders and scientific journals use peer review to decide which projects to fund
or articles to publish. Reviewer training is an intervention to improve the quality of peer …

Peer review practices for evaluating biomedical research grants: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association

L Liaw, JE Freedman, LB Becker, NN Mehta… - Circulation …, 2017 - Am Heart Assoc
The biomedical research enterprise depends on the fair and objective peer review of
research grants, leading to the distribution of resources through efficient and robust …

What makes an effective grants peer reviewer? An exploratory study of the necessary skills

MLE Steiner Davis, TR Conner, K Miller-Bains… - PloS one, 2020 - journals.plos.org
This exploratory mixed methods study describes skills required to be an effective peer
reviewer as a member of review panels conducted for federal agencies that fund research …