Abstract Hegemonic Open Science, emergent from the circuits of knowledge production in
the Global North and serving the economic interests of platform capitalism, systematically …

Scientific publication and its Peer Review system strongly rely on a few major industry
players controlling most journals (eg Elsevier), databases (eg Scopus) and metrics (eg JCR …

A necessary volume of essays working to decolonize the digital humanities Often conceived
of as an all-inclusive “big tent,” digital humanities has in fact been troubled by a lack of …

The promise of open access for the global South has not been fully met. Publishing is
dominated by Northern publishers, which disadvantages Southern authors through platform …

Openness in education has received significant attention in recent years. To comprehend
this concept in education ecosystems thoroughly, a longitudinal study is crucial, offering a …

Recent debates have highlighted the colonial roots and legacies of museums, prompting
intense discussions about these institutions within the museums themselves. Amidst the …

In this introduction for the special section on “Exclusions in the History of Media Studies,” we
begin by calling attention to the constituting role that exclusion has played in the …

Democratizing access to information is an enabler for our digital future. It can transform how
knowledge is created, preserved, and shared, and strengthen the connection between …

What is the point of publishing in the humanities? This Element provides an answer to this
question. It builds on a unique set of quantitative and qualitative data to understand why …

The emergence of a global science system after the second world war was spurred by
transformations in academic publishing and information science. Amidst Russian-American …