Scientific peer review | Annual Review of Information Science and Technology skip to main
content ACM Digital Library home ACM home Google, Inc. (search) Advanced Search Browse …

Despite the surging interest in introducing lottery mechanisms into decision-making
procedures for science funding bodies, the discourse on funding-by-lottery remains …

Obtaining grant funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) is increasingly
competitive, as funding success rates have declined over the past decade. To allocate …

Narrative reviews of peer review research have concluded that there is negligible evidence
of gender bias in the awarding of grants based on peer review. Here, we report the findings …

Peer review is valued in higher education, but also widely criticized in terms of potential
biases, particularly gender. We evaluate gender differences in peer reviews of grant …

© 2004 Rebecca S. Eisenberg f Robert & Barbara Luciano Professor of Law, University of
Michigan Law School. I am grateful to Marty Adelman, Robert Cook-Deegan, Rochelle …

In science, peer review is the best-established method of assessing manuscripts for
publication and applications for research fellowships and grants. However, the fairness of …

This study developed and evaluated a brief training program for grant reviewers that aimed
to increase inter-rater reliability, rating scale knowledge, and effort to read the grant review …

Background Grant giving relies heavily on peer review for the assessment of the quality of
proposals but the evidence of effects of these procedures is scarce. Objectives To estimate …

Objective To examine the impact of applying for funding on personal workloads, stress and
family relationships. Design Qualitative study of researchers preparing grant proposals …