Decades of reasoning and decision-making research have established that human
judgment is often biased by intuitive heuristics. Recent “error” or bias detection studies have …

As an editor, I am very grateful that Jonathan Evans accepted to write the closing chapter to
this volume. Jonathan is widely considered the godfather of the standard dual process …

The issue of climate change has become central in recent years as alarming data
accumulate. It nevertheless has its critics, consisting of people denying climate change or …

Most current information systems security theories assume a rational actor making
deliberate decisions, yet recent research in psychology suggests that such deliberate …

Propensity to judge randomly generated, syntactically correct (ie, bullshit) statements as
profound is associated with a variety of conceptually relevant variables (eg, intuitive …

Considerable evidence supports the sequential two-system (“default interventionist”) model
of moral judgement, as proposed by Greene and others. We tested whether judgement …

We develop a novel bounded rationality model of imperfect reasoning as the interaction
between automatic (System 1) and analytical (System 2) thinking. In doing so, we formalize …

Reasoning and decision making are error prone. This is often attributed to a fast,
phylogenetically old System 1. It is striking, however, that perceptuo-motor decision making …

A key component of the susceptibility to cognitive biases is the ability to monitor for conflict
between intuitively cued “heuristic” answers and logical principles. While there is evidence …

An ongoing debate in the literature on human reasoning concerns whether or not the logical
status (valid vs. invalid) of an argument can be intuitively detected. The finding that …