[HTML][HTML] The science of science: From the perspective of complex systems

A Zeng, Z Shen, J Zhou, J Wu, Y Fan, Y Wang… - Physics reports, 2017 - Elsevier
The science of science (SOS) is a rapidly developing field which aims to understand,
quantify and predict scientific research and the resulting outcomes. The problem is …

[HTML][HTML] What do we know about grant peer review in the health sciences?

S Guthrie, I Ghiga, S Wooding - F1000Research, 2017 - ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Background: Peer review decisions award an estimated> 95% of academic medical
research funding, so it is crucial to understand how well they work and if they could be …

Topic choice contributes to the lower rate of NIH awards to African-American/black scientists

TA Hoppe, A Litovitz, KA Willis, RA Meseroll… - Science …, 2019 - science.org
Despite efforts to promote diversity in the biomedical workforce, there remains a lower rate of
funding of National Institutes of Health R01 applications submitted by African …

[HTML][HTML] “Excellence R Us”: university research and the fetishisation of excellence

S Moore, C Neylon, M Paul Eve… - Palgrave …, 2017 - nature.com
The rhetoric of “excellence” is pervasive across the academy. It is used to refer to research
outputs as well as researchers, theory and education, individuals and organizations, from art …

[图书][B] Science fictions: Exposing fraud, bias, negligence and hype in science

S Ritchie - 2020 - books.google.com
'Required reading for everyone'Adam Rutherford Shortlisted for the Royal Society Science
Book Prize 2021 Medicine, education, psychology, economics-wherever it really matters, we …

How to avoid borrowed plumes in academia

M Osterloh, BS Frey - Research policy, 2020 - Elsevier
Publications in top journals today have a powerful influence on academic careers although
there is much criticism of using journal rankings to evaluate individual articles. We ask why …

Research funding: The case for a modified lottery

FC Fang, A Casadevall - MBio, 2016 - Am Soc Microbiol
The time-honored mechanism of allocating funds based on ranking of proposals by scientific
peer review is no longer effective, because review panels cannot accurately stratify …

[HTML][HTML] The acceptability of using a lottery to allocate research funding: a survey of applicants

M Liu, V Choy, P Clarke, A Barnett, T Blakely… - Research integrity and …, 2020 - Springer
Abstract Background The Health Research Council of New Zealand is the first major
government funding agency to use a lottery to allocate research funding for their Explorer …

[HTML][HTML] Research funding: past performance is a stronger predictor of future scientific output than reviewer scores

B Győrffy, P Herman, I Szabó - Journal of Informetrics, 2020 - Elsevier
Scientific grants are awarded almost exclusively on the basis of an independent peer review
of a proposal submitted by the principal investigator (PI). The writing and reviewing of these …

[HTML][HTML] Mavericks and lotteries

S Avin - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 2019 - Elsevier
Abstract In 2013 the Health Research Council of New Zealand began a stream of funding
titled 'Explorer Grants', and in 2017 changes were introduced to the funding mechanisms of …