S Guthrie, I Ghiga, S Wooding - F1000Research, 2017 - ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Background: Peer review decisions award an estimated> 95% of academic medical research funding, so it is crucial to understand how well they work and if they could be …
TA Hoppe, A Litovitz, KA Willis, RA Meseroll… - Science …, 2019 - science.org
Despite efforts to promote diversity in the biomedical workforce, there remains a lower rate of funding of National Institutes of Health R01 applications submitted by African …
The rhetoric of “excellence” is pervasive across the academy. It is used to refer to research outputs as well as researchers, theory and education, individuals and organizations, from art …
'Required reading for everyone'Adam Rutherford Shortlisted for the Royal Society Science Book Prize 2021 Medicine, education, psychology, economics-wherever it really matters, we …
Publications in top journals today have a powerful influence on academic careers although there is much criticism of using journal rankings to evaluate individual articles. We ask why …
The time-honored mechanism of allocating funds based on ranking of proposals by scientific peer review is no longer effective, because review panels cannot accurately stratify …
Abstract Background The Health Research Council of New Zealand is the first major government funding agency to use a lottery to allocate research funding for their Explorer …
B Győrffy, P Herman, I Szabó - Journal of Informetrics, 2020 - Elsevier
Scientific grants are awarded almost exclusively on the basis of an independent peer review of a proposal submitted by the principal investigator (PI). The writing and reviewing of these …
S Avin - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 2019 - Elsevier
Abstract In 2013 the Health Research Council of New Zealand began a stream of funding titled 'Explorer Grants', and in 2017 changes were introduced to the funding mechanisms of …