S Guthrie, I Ghiga, S Wooding - F1000research, 2017 - europepmc.org
Background: Peer review decisions award an estimated> 95% of academic medical research funding, so it is crucial to understand how well they work and if they could be …
S Guthrie, I Ghiga, S Wooding - F1000Research, 2017 - pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Background: Peer review decisions award an estimated> 95% of academic medical research funding, so it is crucial to understand how well they work and if they could be …
In 2009, RAND Europe conducted a literature review in order to assess the effectiveness and efficiency of peer review for grant funding. This report presents an update to that review …
S Guthrie, G Ioana, S Wooding - F1000Research, 2017 - search.proquest.com
Background: Peer review decisions award an estimated> 95% of academic medical research funding, so it is crucial to understand how well they work and if they could be …
S Guthrie, I Ghiga, S Wooding - F1000Research, 2018 - f1000research.com
Background: Peer review decisions award an estimated> 95% of academic medical research funding, so it is crucial to understand how well they work and if they could be …
S Guthrie, I Ghiga, S Wooding - F1000Research, 2018 - f1000research.com
Background: Peer review decisions award an estimated> 95% of academic medical research funding, so it is crucial to understand how well they work and if they could be …
S Guthrie, I Ghiga, S Wooding - F1000research, 2017 - europepmc.org
Background: Peer review decisions award an estimated> 95% of academic medical research funding, so it is crucial to understand how well they work and if they could be …