This article proposes a methodology for measuring how deferential judicial reasoning is in
human rights cases. The proposed framework ranks four strategies of exercising deference …

This article proposes a methodology for measuring how deferential judicial reasoning is in
human rights cases. The proposed framework ranks four strategies of exercising deference …

This paper proposes a methodology for measuring how deferential judicial reasoning is in
human rights cases. The proposed framework ranks four strategies of exercising deference …

Courts around the world have converged on three core principles for adjudicating human
rights that are subject to a limitation clause. The first relates to the structure of the …

This paper proposes a methodology for measuring how deferential judicial reasoning is in
human rights cases. The proposed framework ranks four strategies of exercising deference …

This article proposes a methodology for measuring how deferential judicial reasoning is in
human rights cases. The proposed framework ranks four strategies of exercising deference …

This article proposes a methodology for measuring how deferential judicial reasoning is in
human rights cases. The proposed framework ranks four strategies of exercising deference …

This article proposes a methodology for measuring how deferential judicial reasoning is in
human rights cases. The proposed framework ranks four strategies of exercising …

HKU Scholars Hub: A preliminary framework for measuring deference in rights reasoning Skip
navigation HKU Login Guest Login Home Publications Researchers Staff Research …

This article proposes a methodology for measuring how deferential judicial reasoning is in
human rights cases. The proposed framework ranks four strategies of exercising deference …