In this paper, we investigate various possible (Bayesian) precisifications of the (somewhat vague) statements of “the equal weight view”(EWV) that have appeared in the recent …
We'll be talking about a pair of (Bayesian) agents S1 and S2 who are epistemic peers, regarding some propositions P. We'll call such p's in P peer-propositions (for S1 and S2). We …
Suppose two agents, S1 and S2, are epistemic peers regarding a proposition p: that is, suppose S1 and S2 are equally competent, equally impartial, and equally able to evaluate …
Suppose two agents, S1 and S2, are epistemic peers regarding a proposition p: that is, suppose S1 and S2 are equally competent, equally impartial, and equally able to evaluate …
Suppose two agents, S1 and S2, are epistemic peers regarding a proposition p: that is, suppose S1 and S2 are equally competent, equally impartial, and equally able to evaluate …
D Jehle, B Fitelson - Episteme (Edinburgh University Press), 2009 - search.ebscohost.com
In this paper, we investigate various possible (Bayesian) precisifications of the (somewhat vague) statements of “the equal weight view”(EWV) that have appeared in the recent …
D Jehle, B Fitelson - 2009 - fitelson.s464.sureserver.com
Suppose two agents, S1 and S2, are epistemic peers regarding a proposition p: that is, suppose S1 and S2 are equally competent, equally impartial, and equally able to evaluate …
In this paper, we investigate various possible (Bayesian) precisifications of the (somewhat vague) statements of “the equal weight view”(EWV) that have appeared in the recent …
Suppose two agents, S1 and S2, are epistemic peers regarding a proposition p: that is, suppose S1 and S2 are equally competent, equally impartial, and equally able to evaluate …