The stimulus evaluation view on P3 latency holds that P3 latency mainly reflects stimulus‐
processing time, in contrast to response‐processing lime. A review of the experimental …

Abstract Falkenstein, Hohnsbein, and Hoorman (1994) suggested that common measures of
P300 latency confound a “P‐SR” component whose latency corresponds to stimulus …

The latency of the P300 component of the event‐related brain potential plays a unique role
in mental chronometry. This is illustrated by presenting data from two experiments that …

P300 latency is commonly thought to provide a chronometric index of the duration of
perceptual processing. Because the evidence in favor of this assumption is controversial, we …

The present review focuses on the utility of the amplitude of P3 of as a measure of
processing capacity and mental workload. The paper starts with a brief outline of the …

Mental chronometry, in which conclusions about human information processing are reached
through measures of subjects' reaction time, has contributed substantially to studies of …

It is well established that reaction time (RT) is shorter when a response signal is preceded
by a warning signal, because the warning signal causes the participant to prepare for the …

The present paper critically examines the contributions of Event-Related Potential (ERP)
measures in mental chronometry research. It is argued that amplitude variation in ERP …

McCarthy and Donchin (1981) found that the latency of a late positive component of the
event‐related potential (ERP) was influenced by the presence of noise in a stimulus matrix …

Simple motor reaction time and judgment of temporal order are commonly recognized as
two methods for estimation of perceptual latency. Unfortunately, the results obtained by the …