This Article provides a rare comprehensive empirical assessment of oral argument outside
of the United States. Drawing on a novel dataset over twenty-six years (1995–2019) …

This Article provides a rare comprehensive empirical assessment of oral argument outside
of the United States. Drawing on a novel dataset over 26 years (1995–2019), comprising …

This chapter examines the conditions for a special kind of constitutional-cultural
transformation—one in which a hegemonic ideology of law's autonomy from politics …

Modern judicial review in Australia has been characterised by a significant increase in the
judiciary's willingness to constrain the actions of both the executive and the legislature …

Comparative Judicial Politics synthesizes the now extensive scholarly work on judicial
politics from around the world, focusing on legal traditions, lawyers, judges, constitutional …

This edited collection brings together scholars and practitioners in every chapter to provide a
comprehensive and unique exploration of courts in Australia. The primary focus is to identify …

Examining oral argument in the Australian High Court and comparing to the US Supreme
Court, this article shows that institutional design drives judicial interruptive behavior. Many of …

What does doing comparative law involve? Too often, explicit methodological discussions in
comparative law remain limited to the level of pure theory, neglecting to test out critiques and …

By global standards, the US Supreme Court is unusual in a number of respects, but one of
its most distinctive characteristics is its reluctance to engage in comparative constitutional …

In a ground-breaking study on the nature of judicial behaviour in the Supreme Court of
Canada, Donald Songer, Susan Johnson, CL Ostberg, and Matthew Wetstein use three …