Building on the old adage that the deliberate mind corrects the emotional heart, the
influential dual process model of moral cognition has posited that utilitarian responding to …

According to an influential dual-process model, a moral judgment is the outcome of a rapid,
affect-laden process and a slower, deliberative process. If these outputs conflict, decision …

Sacrificial moral dilemmas elicit a strong conflict between the motive to not personally harm
someone and the competing motive to achieving the greater good, which is often described …

Do moral judgments hinge on the time available to render them? According to a recent dual-
process model of moral judgment, moral dilemmas that engage emotional processes are …

The prominent dual process model of moral cognition suggests that reasoners intuitively
detect that harming others is wrong (deontological System-1 morality) but have to engage in …

The dual-process model of moral judgment postulates that utilitarian responses to moral
dilemmas (eg, accepting to kill one to save five) are demanding of cognitive resources. Here …

Considerable evidence supports the sequential two-system (“default interventionist”) model
of moral judgement, as proposed by Greene and others. We tested whether judgement …

A substantial body of research supports a dual-process theory of moral judgment, according
to which characteristically deontological judgments are driven by automatic emotional …

To what extent do moral judgments depend on conscious reasoning from explicitly
understood principles? We address this question by investigating one particular moral …

According to Joshua Greene's influential dual process model of moral judgment, different
modes of processing are associated with distinct moral outputs: automatic processing with …