Background: In some randomized clinical trials, transradial access (TRA) compared with
transfemoral access (TFA) was associated with lower mortality in patients with coronary …

BACKGROUND: Small randomized trials have demonstrated that radial access reduces
access site complications compared to a femoral approach. The objective of this meta …

Objectives: This study sought to assess whether transradial access (TRA) compared with
transfemoral access (TFA) is associated with consistent outcomes in male and female …

Objective It is still debated if benefits associated with radial versus femoral access for
coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) are due to the access …

Background—The radial artery is increasingly adopted as the primary access site for cardiac
catheterization because of patient preference, lower bleeding rates, cost effectiveness, and …

Since its advent over two decades ago, transradial access for cardiac catheterization and
percutaneous intervention has evolved into a versatile and evidence-based approach for …

Background—Radial artery access for coronary angiography and interventions has been
promoted for reducing hemostasis time and vascular complications compared with femoral …

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of radial
versus femoral access in women undergoing coronary angiography/intervention …

Background It is unclear whether radial compared with femoral access improves outcomes
in unselected patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management …

Background Small trials have suggested that radial access for percutaneous coronary
intervention (PCI) reduces vascular complications and bleeding compared with femoral …