How many dual-process theories do we need? One, two, or many?

JSBT Evans - 2009 - psycnet.apa.org
Dual-process theories of cognition are to be found everywhere in psychology although the
literatures concerned may contain little or no cross referencing to each other. These theories …

Rule-based reasoning is fast and belief-based reasoning can be slow: Challenging current explanations of belief-bias and base-rate neglect.

IR Newman, M Gibb, VA Thompson - Journal of experimental …, 2017 - psycnet.apa.org
It is commonly assumed that belief-based reasoning is fast and automatic, whereas rule-
based reasoning is slower and more effortful. Dual-Process theories of reasoning rely on …

Conflict, metacognition, and analytic thinking

VA Thompson, SC Johnson - Thinking & Reasoning, 2014 - Taylor & Francis
One hundred and three participants solved conflict and non-conflict versions of four
reasoning tasks using a two-response procedure: a base rate task, a causal reasoning task …

The smart intuitor: Cognitive capacity predicts intuitive rather than deliberate thinking

M Raoelison, VA Thompson, W De Neys - Cognition, 2020 - Elsevier
Cognitive capacity is commonly assumed to predict performance in classic reasoning tasks
because people higher in cognitive capacity are believed to be better at deliberately …

Cognitive style and religiosity: The role of conflict detection

G Pennycook, JA Cheyne, N Barr, DJ Koehler… - Memory & …, 2014 - Springer
Recent research has indicated a negative relation between the propensity for analytic
reasoning and religious beliefs and practices. Here, we propose conflict detection as a …

Subtracting “ought” from “is”: Descriptivism versus normativism in the study of human thinking

S Elqayam, JSBT Evans - Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2011 - cambridge.org
We propose a critique of normativism, defined as the idea that human thinking reflects a
normative system against which it should be measured and judged. We analyze the …

Smarter than we think: When our brains detect that we are biased

WD Neys, O Vartanian, V Goel - Psychological science, 2008 - journals.sagepub.com
Human reasoning is often biased by stereotypical intuitions. The nature of such bias is not
clear. Some authors claim that people are mere heuristic thinkers and are not aware that …

[图书][B] Straight choices: The psychology of decision making

BR Newell, DA Lagnado, DR Shanks - 2022 - taylorfrancis.com
Straight Choices provides a fascinating introduction to the psychology of decision making,
enhanced by discussion of relevant examples of decision problems faced in everyday life …

Biased but in doubt: Conflict and decision confidence

W De Neys, S Cromheeke, M Osman - PloS one, 2011 - journals.plos.org
Human reasoning is often biased by intuitive heuristics. A central question is whether the
bias results from a failure to detect that the intuitions conflict with traditional normative …

The role of analytic thinking in moral judgements and values

G Pennycook, JA Cheyne, N Barr, DJ Koehler… - Thinking & …, 2014 - Taylor & Francis
While individual differences in the willingness and ability to engage analytic processing
have long informed research in reasoning and decision making, the implications of such …