CKW De Dreu, J Gross - Behavioral and brain sciences, 2019 - cambridge.org
Conflict can profoundly affect individuals and their groups. Oftentimes, conflict involves a clash between one side seeking change and increased gains through victory and the other …
L Glowacki - Behavioral and brain sciences, 2024 - cambridge.org
While some species have affiliative and even cooperative interactions between individuals of different social groups, humans are alone in having durable, positive-sum, interdependent …
AM Colman - Behavioral and brain sciences, 2003 - cambridge.org
Rational choice theory enjoys unprecedented popularity and influence in the behavioral and social sciences, but it generates intractable problems when applied to socially interactive …
J Archer - Behavioral and brain sciences, 2009 - cambridge.org
I argue that the magnitude and nature of sex differences in aggression, their development, causation, and variability, can be better explained by sexual selection than by the alternative …
N Baumard, D Sperber - Behavioral and brain sciences, 2010 - ora.ox.ac.uk
While we agree that the cultural imbalance in the recruitment of participants in psychology experiments is highly detrimental, we emphasize the need to complement this criticism with …
JR Hibbing, KB Smith, JR Alford - Behavioral and brain sciences, 2014 - cambridge.org
Disputes between those holding differing political views are ubiquitous and deep-seated, and they often follow common, recognizable lines. The supporters of tradition and stability …
CF Camerer - Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2003 - cambridge.org
Many weaknesses of game theory are cured by new models that embody simple cognitive principles, while maintaining the formalism and generality that makes game theory useful …
We argue that the lack of large cross-cultural differences in many games with student subjects from developed countries may be due to the nature of the games studied. These …
F Guala - Behavioral and brain sciences, 2012 - cambridge.org
Economists and biologists have proposed a distinction between two mechanisms–“strong” and “weak” reciprocity–that may explain the evolution of human sociality. Weak reciprocity …