The distinction between intuitive and analytic thinking is common in psychology. However,
while often being quite clear on the characteristics of the two processes ('Type 1'processes …

A major challenge for Dual Process Theories of reasoning is to predict the circumstances
under which intuitive answers reached on the basis of Type 1 processing are kept or …

Popular dual-process models of thinking have long conceived intuition and deliberation as
two qualitatively different processes. Single-process-model proponents claim that the …

Studies on human reasoning have long established that intuitions can bias inference and
lead to violations of logical norms. Popular dual-process models, which characterize …

A lay definition of intuition holds that it involves immediate apprehension in the absence of
reasoning. From a more technical point of view, I argue also that intuition should be seen as …

I present a critical discussion of dual-process theories of reasoning and decision making
with particular attention to the nature and role of Type 2 processes. The original theory …

Popular dual process theories have characterized human thinking as an interplay between
an intuitive-heuristic and demanding-analytic reasoning process. Although monitoring the …

Influential dual process models of human thinking posit that reasoners typically produce a
fast, intuitive heuristic (ie, Type-1) response which might subsequently be overridden and …

Dual Process Theories (DPT) of reasoning posit that judgments are mediated by both fast,
automatic processes and more deliberate, analytic ones. A critical, but unanswered question …

The idea that decision making involves distinctive analytic and intuitive components
resonates with everyday experience. It has also been discussed across at least two …