Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-thh2zTotal loading time: 0Render date: 2024-08-07T13:07:00.788ZHas data issue: falsehasContentIssue false

EVALUATION OF TOPOLOGY OPTIMIZATION AND GENERATIVE DESIGN TOOLS AS SUPPORT FOR CONCEPTUAL DESIGN

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 June 2020

D. Vlah*
Affiliation:
University of Ljubljana, Slovenia
R. Žavbi
Affiliation:
University of Ljubljana, Slovenia
N. Vukašinović
Affiliation:
University of Ljubljana, Slovenia

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Nowadays, a large number of different tools that support early phases of design are available to engineers. In the past decade a specialized set of CAD-based tools were developed, that support the ideation process by generating different design alternatives according to the criteria given by the designer. Two types of tools are discussed in this paper: topology optimization and generative design tools. To investigate to what extent these tools are suitable for use in early design phases and what are the main differences between them, a study was conducted on an industrial case.

Type
Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Anderson, D.M. (2014), Design for Manufacturability: How to Use Concurrent Engineering to Rapidly Develop Low-Cost, High-Quality Products for Lean Production, CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bendsøe, M.P. (1989), “Optimal shape design as a material distribution problem”, Structural Optimization, Springer-Verlag, Vol. 1 No. 4, pp. 193202. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01650949Google Scholar
Bendsøe, M.P. and Kikuchi, N. (1988), “Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method”, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, North-Holland, Vol. 71 No. 2, pp. 197224. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(88)90086-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bici, M., Broggiato, G.B. and Campana, F. (2017), “Topological Optimization in Concept Design: starting approach and a validation case study”, Springer, pp. 289299. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45781-930Google Scholar
Caldas, L.G. (2001), An evolution-based generative design system: using adaptation to shape architectural form, [PhD Thesis], Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Chen, X. “Anthony” et al. (2018), “Forte: User-Driven Generative Design”, Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2018, ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, pp. 112. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deb, K. (2011), Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms: An Introduction, available at: http://www.iitk.ac.in/kangal/deb.htm (accessed 4 July 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horváth, I. (2004), “On some Crucial Issues of Computer Support of Conceptual Design”, Product Engineering, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 123142. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2933-0_9Google Scholar
Jia, H. et al. (2011), “Evolutionary level set method for structural topology optimization”, Computers and Structures, Vol. 89 No. 5-6, pp. 445454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2010.11.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kazi, R.H. et al. (2017), “DreamSketch: Early Stage 3D Design Explorations with Sketching and Generative Design”, Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology - UIST ’17, ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, pp. 401414. https://doi.org/10.1145/3126594.3126662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krish, S. (2011), “A practical generative design method”, Computer-Aided Design, Vol. 43 No. 1, pp. 88100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2010.09.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, A.W. and Vajna, S. (2018), “Support of searching for solutions by automated structural optimization”, pp. 369380. https://doi.org/110.21278/idc.2018.0383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Querin, O.M. (2017), Topology Design Methods for Structural Optimization, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Rozvany, G. (2000), “The SIMP method in topology optimization - Theoretical background, advantages and new applications”, https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2000-4738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shea, K., Aish, R. and Gourtovaia, M. (2005), “Towards integrated performance-driven generative design tools”, Automation in Construction, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 253264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2004.07.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tejani, G.G. et al. (2018), “Size, shape, and topology optimization of planar and space trusses using mutation-based improved metaheuristics”, Journal of Computational Design and Engineering, Elsevier, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 198214. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCDE.2017.10.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyflopoulos, E. et al. (2018), “State of the art of generative design and topology optimization and potential research needs”, DS 91: Proceedings of NordDesign 2018, Linköping, Sweden, 14-17 August 2018.Google Scholar
Vajna, S. et al. (2005), “The Autogenetic Design Theory: An evolutionary view of the design process”, Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 423440. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544820500267781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, L. et al. (2002), Collaborative Conceptual Design - State of the Art and Future Trends, available at: www.elsevier.com/locate/cad (accessed 15 November 2019).Google Scholar
Xie, Y.M. and Steven, G.P. (1994), “Optimal design of multiple load case structures using an evolutionary procedure”, Engineering Computations, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 295302. https://doi.org/10.1108/02644409410799290CrossRefGoogle Scholar