Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A clinical decision support system to predict the efficacy for EGFR-TKIs based on artificial neural network

  • Research
  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) was affected by numerous factors. In the study, we developed and validated an artificial neural network (ANN) system based on clinical characteristics and next-generation sequencing (NGS) to support clinical decisions.

Methods

A multicenter retrospective non-interventional study was conducted. 240 patients from three hospitals with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and EGFR mutation were tested by NGS before the first treatment. All patients received formal EGFR-TKIs treatment. Five different models were individually trained to predict the efficacy of EGFR-TKIs based on one medical center with 188 patients. Two independent cohorts from other medical centers were collected for external validation.

Results

Compared with logistic regression, four machine learning methods showed better predicting abilities for EGFR-TKIs. The inclusion of NGS tests improved the predictive power of models. ANN performed best on the dataset with mutations TP53, RB1, PIK3CA, EGFR mutation sites, and tumor mutation burden (TMB). The prediction accuracy, recall and AUC were 0.82, 0.82, and 0.82, respectively in our final model. In the external validation set, ANN still showed good performance and differentiated patients with poor outcomes. Finally, a clinical decision support software based on ANN was developed and provided a visualization interface for clinicians.

Conclusion

This study provides an approach to assess the efficacy of NSCLC patients with first-line EGFR-TKI treatment. Software is developed to support clinical decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

Data are available upon request but may require data transfer agreements. Codes on shared on github (https://github.com/GuanRunwei/A-Clinical-Decision-Support-System-of-EGFR-TKIs).

References

  • Blons H et al (2021) PTEN, ATM, IDH1 mutations and MAPK pathway activation as modulators of PFS and OS in patients treated by first line EGFR TKI, an ancillary study of the French Cooperative Thoracic Intergroup (IFCT) Biomarkers France project. Lung Cancer 151:69–75

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Canale M et al (2017) Impact of TP53 mutations on outcome in EGFR-mutated patients treated with first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Clin Cancer Res 23(9):2195–2202

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chen YH et al (2019) Clinical factors associated with treatment outcomes in EGFR mutant non-small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases: a case-control observational study. BMC Cancer 19(1):1006

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Chen H et al (2020) Concomitant genetic alterations are associated with response to EGFR targeted therapy in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Transl Lung Cancer Res 9(4):1225–1234

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng FJ et al (2021) Cigarette smoke-induced LKB1/AMPK pathway deficiency reduces EGFR TKI sensitivity in NSCLC. Oncogene 40(6):1162–1175

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chetan MR, Gleeson FV (2021) Radiomics in predicting treatment response in non-small-cell lung cancer: current status, challenges and future perspectives. Eur Radiol 31(2):1049–1058

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz JA, Wishart DS (2007) Applications of machine learning in cancer prediction and prognosis. Cancer Inform 2:59–77

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cui Y et al (2022) Association of KDR mutation with better clinical outcomes in pan-cancer for immune checkpoint inhibitors. Am J Cancer Res 12(4):1766–1783

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Guo Y et al (2020) Concurrent genetic alterations and other biomarkers predict treatment efficacy of EGFR-TKIs in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer: a review. Front Oncol 10:610923

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hong S et al (2018) Concomitant genetic alterations with response to treatment and epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with EGFR-mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer. JAMA Oncol 4(5):739–742

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Inoue A (2020) Progress in individualized treatment for EGFR-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci 96(7):266–272

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jin Y et al (2018) Mechanisms of primary resistance to EGFR targeted therapy in advanced lung adenocarcinomas. Lung Cancer 124:110–116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan EJ et al (2017) Prospective comprehensive molecular characterization of lung adenocarcinomas for efficient patient matching to approved and emerging therapies. Cancer Discov 7(6):596–609

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kim Y et al (2019) Concurrent genetic alterations predict the progression to target therapy in EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC. J Thorac Oncol 14(2):193–202

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kourou K et al (2015) Machine learning applications in cancer prognosis and prediction. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 13:8–17

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Labbe C et al (2017) Prognostic and predictive effects of TP53 co-mutation in patients with EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Lung Cancer 111:23–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li X et al (2021) Multi-institutional development and external validation of machine learning-based models to predict relapse risk of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after radical resection. J Transl Med 19(1):281

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Liang X et al (2022) Clinical implications of ctDNA for EGFR-TKIs as first-line treatment in NSCLC. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 149:1211–1220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lin Y, Wang X, Jin H (2014) EGFR-TKI resistance in NSCLC patients: mechanisms and strategies. Am J Cancer Res 4(5):411–435

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Loshchilov I, Hutter F (2018) Fixing weight decay regularization in Adam

  • Mok TS et al (2009) Gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med 361(10):947–957

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen B et al (2022) Genomic characterization of metastatic patterns from prospective clinical sequencing of 25,000 patients. Cell 185(3):563-575.e11

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Niederst MJ et al (2015) RB loss in resistant EGFR mutant lung adenocarcinomas that transform to small-cell lung cancer. Nat Commun 6:6377

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Noronha V et al (2020) Gefitinib versus gefitinib plus pemetrexed and carboplatin chemotherapy in EGFR-mutated lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 38(2):124–136

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Offin M et al (2019) Tumor mutation burden and efficacy of EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with EGFR-mutant lung cancers. Clin Cancer Res 25(3):1063–1069

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pan Y et al (2019) Larger tumors are associated with inferior progression-free survival of first-line EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors and a lower abundance of EGFR mutation in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Thorac Cancer 10(4):686–694

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Peng H et al (2019) Prognostic value of deep learning PET/CT-based radiomics: potential role for future individual induction chemotherapy in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 25(14):4271–4279

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Canales J, Parra-Cuentas E, Wistuba II (2016) Diagnosis and molecular classification of lung cancer. Cancer Treat Res 170:25–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saito H et al (2019) Erlotinib plus bevacizumab versus erlotinib alone in patients with EGFR-positive advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NEJ026): interim analysis of an open-label, randomised, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 20(5):625–635

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scagliotti GV et al (2008) Phase III study comparing cisplatin plus gemcitabine with cisplatin plus pemetrexed in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 26(21):3543–3551

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel RL et al (2021) Cancer statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin 71(1):7–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skoulidis F, Heymach JV (2019) Co-occurring genomic alterations in non-small-cell lung cancer biology and therapy. Nat Rev Cancer 19(9):495–509

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Song J et al (2020) Development and validation of a machine learning model to explore tyrosine kinase inhibitor response in patients with stage IV EGFR variant-positive non-small cell lung cancer. JAMA Netw Open 3(12):e2030442

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Soria JC et al (2018) Osimertinib in untreated egfr-mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 378(2):113–125

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sung H et al (2021) Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 71:209–249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tan J et al (2021) The predictive values of advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients harboring uncommon EGFR mutations-the mutation patterns, use of different generations of EGFR-TKIs, and concurrent genetic alterations. Front Oncol 11:646577

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

DS and RG designed this study and directed the research group in all aspects. XL and YC drafted the manuscript. JZ, YM and JZ collected the data. RG and YY provided the statistical software and performed the data analysis. JD and JS arranged the Figures and Tables. LL and WM revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Liting Lv, Dong Shen or Renhua Guo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, affiliated hospital of Nantong University and Jiangyin People’s Hospital.

Informed consent

Yes.

Registry and the registration

N/A.

Animal studies

N/A.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 16 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liang, X., Guan, R., Zhu, J. et al. A clinical decision support system to predict the efficacy for EGFR-TKIs based on artificial neural network. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 149, 12265–12274 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-023-05104-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-023-05104-3

Keywords

Navigation