Skip to main content

Divergence and fair testing

  • Concurrency II
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Automata, Languages and Programming (ICALP 1995)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 944))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper develops a new testing-based semantic theory of processes that aims to circumvent difficulties that traditional testing/failures theories have in dealing with divergent behavior. Our framework incorporates a notion of fairness into the determination of when a process passes a test; we contrast this definition with existing approaches and give characterizations of the induced semantic preorders. An example highlights the utility of our results.

Research supported by NSF grant CCR-9120995, ONR Young Investigator Award N00014-92-J-1582, NSF Young Investigator Award CCR-9257963, and NSF grant CCR-9402807.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J.C.M. Baeten, editor. Applications of Process Algebra, vol. 17 of Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science. Cambridge Press, Cambridge, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J.A. Bergstra, J.W. Klop, and E.-R. Olderog. Failures without chaos: A new process semantics for fair abstraction. In M. Wirsing, editor, Formal Description Techniques—III, pages 77–103. North-Holland, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  3. E. Best. Fairness and conspiracies. Inf. Proc. Letters, 18:215–220, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  4. S.D. Brookes, C.A.R. Hoare, and A.W. Roscoe. A theory of communicating sequential processes. Journal of the ACM, 31(3):560–599, July 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. Cleaveland, J. Parrow, and B. Steifen. The Concurrency Workbench: A semantics-based tool for the verification of finite-state systems. ACM Trans. on Prog. Lang. and Sys., 15(1):36–72, January 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  6. G. Costa and C. Stirling. Weak and strong fairness in CCS. Inf. and Comp., 87:207–244, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. De Nicola. Extensional equivalences for transition systems. Acta Inf., 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. De Nicola and M.C.B. Hennessy. Testing equivalences for processes. Theoret. Comp. Sci., 34:83–133, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  9. N. Francez. Fairness. Springer-Verlag, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M.C.B. Hennessy. An algebraic theory of fair asynchronous communicating processes. Theoret. Comp. Sci., 49:121–143, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M.C.B. Hennessy. Algebraic Theory of Processes. MIT Press, Boston, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  12. C.J. Koomen. Algebraic specification and verification of communications protocols. Science of Comp. Prog., 5:1–36, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. Milner. Communication and Concurrency. Prentice-Hall, London, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Zoltán Fülöp Ferenc Gécseg

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Natarajan, V., Cleaveland, R. (1995). Divergence and fair testing. In: Fülöp, Z., Gécseg, F. (eds) Automata, Languages and Programming. ICALP 1995. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 944. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60084-1_112

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60084-1_112

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-60084-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49425-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics