Human interactions with wildlife are a defining experience of human existence. These
interactions can be positive or negative. People compete with wildlife for food and …

Encounters between humans and wildlife that result in human fatalities can generate public
anxiety and increase pressure on conservation managers and governments for risk …

There is growing political pressure for farmers to use more sustainable agricultural practices
to protect people and the planet. The farming press could encourage farmers to adopt …

Conservation conflicts involve an important emotional component that has been little
investigated so far. In particular, the study of emotions involved in conservation conflicts …

Content published on social media may affect user's attitudes toward wildlife species. We
evaluated viewers' responses to videos published on a popular social medium, focusing …

Soil quality is declining in many parts of the world, with implications for the productivity,
resilience and sustainability of agri-food systems. Research suggests multiple causes of soil …

The internet serves as a dominant source of information and may shape tolerance of wildlife
species. Our experimental study examined how respondents' tolerance for wolves (ie …

Conflict between carnivores and livestock farmers affects human livelihoods and predator
populations. Historically, successful mitigation of this conflict has been limited, sometimes …

Simple Summary Three major Iranian daily newspapers were analysed for news items
relating to wildlife, covering a 7-year study period. Wildlife items were characterised by …

The prioritizing of human demands in human-dominated landscapes shapes human–wildlife
conflicts. Damage to crops is the main cause of conflict with herbivores. In Lithuania …