Success and impact metrics in science are based on a system that perpetuates sexist and
racist “rewards” by prioritizing citations and impact factors. These metrics are flawed and …

Peer review is an important part of the scientific process, but traditional peer review at
journals is coming under increased scrutiny for its inefficiency and lack of transparency. As …

The challenges and opportunities of creating diverse and inclusive workplaces have never
been more important that they are today; but how are publishers responding to changing …

This article offers sociological reflections on race and neurodiversity in UK higher education
(UKHE). Using dialogical knowledge production and collaborative autoethnography, the …

Peer review practices differ substantially between journals and disciplines. This study
presents the results of a survey of 322 editors of journals in ecology, economics, medicine …

Peer reviewers serve a vital role in assessing the value of published scholarship and
improving the quality of submitted manuscripts. To provide more appropriate and systematic …

The term “peer review” often brings to mind the process by which scientific journals solicit
experts to evaluate manuscripts prior to their publication. Scientists have debated the utility …

After yet more vivid examples of how Black people are far too often treated unjustly in
America and the enormous response worldwide, it is high time to recognize racism in our …

Medical education publishing is growing rapidly, with both increasing demand for
publication space and increasing space availability. The increasing speed of publication …

The goal of every author is to have their research work published. In the process of
publishing a peer-reviewed article, authors are often required to revise their original …