Techniques from Natural-Language-Processing offer the opportunities to design new dialog-
based forms of human-computer interaction as well as to analyze the argumentation quality …

This paper surveys and organizes research works in an under-studied area, which we call
automated evaluation for student argumentative writing. Unlike traditional automated writing …

Advances in Natural Language Processing offer techniques to detect the empathy level in
texts. To test if individual feedback on certain students' empathy level in their peer review …

Abstract Conversational Agents (CAs) have become a new paradigm for human-computer
interaction. Despite the potential benefits, there are ethical challenges to the widespread …

We present an annotation approach for capturing structured components and arguments
inlegal case solutions of German students. Based on the appraisal style, which dictates the …

Recent advantages from computational linguists can be leveraged to nudge students with
adaptive self-evaluation based on their argumentation skill level. To investigate how …

We introduce an argumentation annotation approach to model the structure of
argumentative discourse in student-written business model pitches. Additionally, the …

Novice students in law courses or students who encounter legal education face the
challenge of acquiring specialized and highly concept-oriented knowledge. Structured and …

Assessing the quality of an argument is a complex, highly subjective task, influenced by
heterogeneous factors (eg, prior beliefs of the annotators, topic, domain, and application) …

Natural Language Processing (NLP) has become increasingly utilized to provide adaptivity
in educational applications. However, recent research has highlighted a variety of biases in …