[HTML][HTML] A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review

JP Tennant, JM Dugan, D Graziotin, DC Jacques… - …, 2017 - ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Peer review of research articles is a core part of our scholarly communication system. In
spite of its importance, the status and purpose of peer review is often contested. What is its …

The peer review process: past, present, and future

JA Drozdz, MR Ladomery - British Journal of Biomedical …, 2024 - frontierspartnerships.org
The peer review process is a fundamental aspect of modern scientific paper publishing,
underpinning essential quality control. First conceptualised in the 1700s, it is an iterative …

Improving the peer-review process for grant applications: reliability, validity, bias, and generalizability.

HW Marsh, UW Jayasinghe, NW Bond - American psychologist, 2008 - psycnet.apa.org
Peer review is a gatekeeper, the final arbiter of what is valued in academia, but it has been
criticized in relation to traditional psychological research criteria of reliability, validity …

The good, the bad and the rude peer-review

AF Mavrogenis, A Quaile, MM Scarlat - International Orthopaedics, 2020 - Springer
Peer-review is the core of the editorial process and the basis of the publication system. The
quality of peer-review depends on the quality of the peer-reviewers. Peer reviewers are …

Predictive Validity Evidence for Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument Scores: Quality of Submissions to JGIM's Medical Education Special Issue

DA Reed, TJ Beckman, SM Wright, RB Levine… - Journal of general …, 2008 - Springer
Background Deficiencies in medical education research quality are widely acknowledged.
Content, internal structure, and criterion validity evidence support the use of the Medical …

Problems with traditional science publishing and finding a wider niche for post-publication peer review

JA Teixeira da Silva, J Dobránszki - Accountability in research, 2015 - Taylor & Francis
Science affects multiple basic sectors of society. Therefore, the findings made in science
impact what takes place at a commercial level. More specifically, errors in the literature …

Funding grant proposals for scientific research: retrospective analysis of scores by members of grant review panel

N Graves, AG Barnett, P Clarke - Bmj, 2011 - bmj.com
Objective To quantify randomness and cost when choosing health and medical research
projects for funding. Design Retrospective analysis. Setting Grant review panels of the …

Ensuring the quality, fairness, and integrity of journal peer review: A possible role of editors

DB Resnik, SA Elmore - Science and Engineering Ethics, 2016 - Springer
A growing body of literature has identified potential problems that can compromise the
quality, fairness, and integrity of journal peer review, including inadequate review …

Editorial peer reviewers' recommendations at a general medical journal: are they reliable and do editors care?

RL Kravitz, P Franks, MD Feldman, M Gerrity, C Byrne… - PloS one, 2010 - journals.plos.org
Background Editorial peer review is universally used but little studied. We examined the
relationship between external reviewers' recommendations and the editorial outcome of …

Peer review: Recent experience and future directions

M Ware - New review of information networking, 2011 - Taylor & Francis
What are the challenges and opportunities facing peer review in a networked world? We
review the state of journal peer review at the end of 2010, beset by ever-increasing volumes …