Are political attacks a laughing matter? Three experiments on political humor and the effectiveness of negative campaigning

I Verhulsdonk, A Nai, JA Karp - Political Research Quarterly, 2022 - journals.sagepub.com
Research on the effectiveness of negative campaigning offers mixed results. Negative
messages can sometimes work to depress candidate evaluations, but they can also backfire …

[图书][B] Is this any way to run a democratic election?

SJ Wayne - 2019 - taylorfrancis.com
The 2016 and 2018 elections are over, but looking ahead to the 2019–2020 election cycle,
the debate over the fairness and accuracy of our electoral process has never been more …

Audience responses and the context of political speeches

H Choi, P Bull, DJ Reed - Journal of Social and Political …, 2016 - eprints.whiterose.ac.uk
Previous studies showed that cultural dimensions (individualism and collectivism) are
related to audience behavior in responding to political speeches. However, this study …

Laughter and effective presidential leadership: A case study of Ronald Reagan as the 'great communicator'

PA Stewart, RG Dye, C Senior - Plos one, 2024 - journals.plos.org
Former United States President Ronald Reagan's use of media and his charismatic
connection with viewers earned him the moniker “the great communicator”. One aspect of …

[图书][B] Nonverbal communication in political debates

JS Seiter, H Weger - 2020 - books.google.com
Nonverbal Communication in Political Debates presents a framework for understanding and
analyzing the multiple ways that nonverbal behavior functions in political debates. In …

Candidate performance and observable audience response: Laughter and applause–cheering during the first 2016 Clinton–Trump presidential debate

PA Stewart, AD Eubanks, RG Dye, ZH Gong… - Frontiers in …, 2018 - frontiersin.org
Raucous audience applause–cheering, laughter, and even booing by a passionately
involved electorate marked the 2016 presidential debates from the start of the primary …

“Please clap”: Applause, laughter, and booing during the 2016 GOP presidential primary debates

PA Stewart, AD Eubanks, J Miller - PS: Political Science & Politics, 2016 - cambridge.org
The 2016 Republican Party presidential primary debates were unprecedented in the amount
of media and public interest they generated. Substantially driven by curiosity about reality …

Visual priming and framing during the 2020 democratic presidential debates: Electoral status predicts favorable camera treatment

PA Stewart, AD Eubanks, N Hersom… - … Journal of Press …, 2021 - journals.sagepub.com
The 2020 Democratic presidential primary debates provide a unique opportunity to
systematically evaluate network visual production choices in a multicandidate context. The …

[图书][B] The political geography of campaign finance: Fundraising and contribution patterns in presidential elections, 2004–2012

A Dowdle, S Limbocker, PA Stewart, K Sebold… - 2015 - books.google.com
The Political Geography of Campaign Finance examines the distribution of political
campaign contributions in the 2004, 2008, and 2012 preprimary election periods. Using …

Visual priming and framing of the 2016 GOP and Democratic Party presidential primary debates

PA Stewart, AD Eubanks, J Miller - Politics and the Life Sciences, 2019 - cambridge.org
In an on-demand media environment, the 2016 presidential primary debates provided a
ratings and economic boost to host networks surpassing all prior primary debates and even …