QALY maximisation and people's preferences: a methodological review of the literature

P Dolan, R Shaw, A Tsuchiya, A Williams - Health economics, 2005 - Wiley Online Library
In cost‐utility analysis, the numbers of quality‐adjusted life years (QALYs) gained are
aggregated according to the sum‐ranking (or QALY maximisation) rule. This requires that …

Attributes and weights in health care priority setting: a systematic review of what counts and to what extent

Y Gu, E Lancsar, P Ghijben, JRG Butler… - Social Science & …, 2015 - Elsevier
In most societies resources are insufficient to provide everyone with all the health care they
want. In practice, this means that some people are given priority over others. On what basis …

Severity of illness and priority setting in healthcare: a review of the literature

KK Shah - Health policy, 2009 - Elsevier
BACKGROUND: It is widely assumed that the principal objective of healthcare is to
maximise health. However, people may be willing to sacrifice aggregate health gain in order …

Resource allocation, social values and the QALY: a review of the debate and empirical evidence

DLB Schwappach - Health Expectations, 2002 - Wiley Online Library
Most health economists agree that public preferences should play a major role in setting
criteria for distributing scarce resources. The quality‐adjusted life year (QALY) is used as a …

[图书][B] Using cost-effectiveness analysis to improve health care: opportunities and barriers

PJ Neumann - 2004 - books.google.com
As health costs in the US soar past $1.5 trillion, much evidence indicates that the nation
does not get good value for its money. It is widely agreed that we could do better by using …

Weighting and valuing quality-adjusted life-years using stated preference methods: preliminary results from the Social Value of a QALY Project.

R Baker, I Bateman, C Donaldson… - Health technology …, 2010 - researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk
OBJECTIVES: To identify characteristics of beneficiaries of health care over which relative
weights should be derived and to estimate relative weights to be attached to health gains …

Do oncologists believe new cancer drugs offer good value?

E Nadler, B Eckert, PJ Neumann - The oncologist, 2006 - academic.oup.com
Learning Objectives After completing this course, the reader will be able to: Describe how
academic oncologists view the costs of new treatments in their treatment recommendations …

Judgment and decision making.

TD Gilovich, DW Griffin - 2010 - psycnet.apa.org
We believe that the connections between the fields of social psychology and judgment and
decision making (JDM) run deep and that to exclude judgment and decision making from the …

[PDF][PDF] Why don't Americans use cost-effectiveness analysis

PJ Neumann - Am J Manag Care, 2004 - researchgate.net
Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) offers decision makers a structured, rational approach
with which to improve the return on resources expended. But decades after its widespread …

[HTML][HTML] How stable are people's preferences for giving priority to severely ill patients?

PA Ubel - Social science & medicine, 1999 - Elsevier
Background: Previous studies have suggested that people favor allocating resources to
severely ill patients even when they benefit less from treatment than do less severely ill …