Objectives Empirically informed neuropsychological opinion is critical for determining
whether cognitive deficits and symptoms are legitimate, particularly in settings where there …

Objective: Citation and download data pertaining to the 2009 AACN consensus statement
on validity assessment indicated that the topic maintained high interest in subsequent years …

This study tested whether combining the Inventory of Problems–29 (IOP-29) with the Test of
Memory Malingering (TOMM) would increase sensitivity in the detection of experimentally …

Objective: To determine the effectiveness of the Test of Memory Malingering Trial 1
(TOMM1) as a freestanding Performance Validity Test (PVT) as compared to the full TOMM …

Forensic practitioners must shoulder special responsibilities when evaluating over‐stated
pathology (eg, malingering) as well as simulated adjustment. Such determinations may …

Abstract The Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test (M-FAST) was designed as a
screening measure for feigned psychiatric symptoms. When M-FAST Total Scores are …

Elevated overreporting Validity Scale scores on the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality
Inventory–2–Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) are associated with higher scores on collateral …

Current guidelines for psychological assessment recommend the use of multiple validity
measures in an evaluation protocol, particularly in forensic settings. As such, self-report …

Assessment of symptom feigning is paramount in forensic psychological and psychiatric
assessment. The Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms, 2nd Edition (SIRS-2; Rogers …

Malingering of cognitive difficulties constitutes a major issue in psychiatric forensic settings.
Here, we present a selective literature review related to the topic of cognitive malingering …