Objective This paper addressed two focused questions: Focused question 1 (Q1)“what is the
clinical efficacy of transcrestal sinus floor augmentation (TSFA), as compared to lateral sinus …

Purpose To compare clinical and radiographic outcomes of< 7 mm short (SH) implants
inserted in native bone vs longer (ST) implants placed in vertically augmented partially …

Objective To compare the clinical outcomes of extra‐short implants (≤ 6.5 mm) inserted with
one‐stage versus two‐stage technique in adjacent sites of the upper or lower jaw. Materials …

Short implants were introduced to reduce morbidity, treatment duration, and complex bone
regeneration interventions in atrophic jaws and to improve patient-reported outcomes. This …

Objective Clinical indications for maxillary sinus floor elevation with transcrestal techniques
have increased in recent years even in sites with minimal residual bone height (RBH) …

The goal of this systematic study was to compare the survival rate (SR), marginal bone loss
(MBL) and clinical complications between extra‐short implants (≤ 6 mm) and 6‐mm‐longer …

Statement of problem Rehabilitation with wide-diameter reduced-length implants has
become popular for patients with minimal vertical bone. However, a consensus on the …

Objective To answer the question: What do we know so far about the clinical performance of
short implants (≤ 7 mm) when compared to standard length implants in vertically …

This study was designed as a preliminary controlled clinical trial to obtain a side-by-side
comparison of two commercially available largeparticle bovine-derived bone grafts with …

Extra-short implants, of which clinical outcomes remain controversial, are becoming a
potential option rather than long implants with bone augmentation in atrophic partially or …