Orthodoxy in the contemporary debate on knowledge ascriptions holds that the truth‐value
of knowledge ascriptions is purely a matter of truth‐relevant factors. One familiar challenge …

Experimental methods from psycholinguistics allow experimental philosophers to study
important automatic inferences, with a view to explaining and assessing philosophically …

Abstract “Experimental philosophy is philosophy with a little something extra”(Sytsma et al.,
2023, 9). This “little something extra” is the fact that experimental philosophers conduct their …

Abstract Pinillos' Why We Doubt presents a powerful critique of such global skeptical
assertions as “I don't know I am not a brain-in-a-vat (biv)” by introducing a cognitive …

How does experimental philosophy address philosophical questions and problems? That is:
What projects does experimental philosophy pursue? What is their philosophical relevance …

The notion of salience figures prominently in contemporary epistemology and some
empirical evidence suggests a salient alternatives effect on folk epistemological ascriptions …

Skeptical invariantists maintain that the expression “knows” invariably expresses an
epistemically extremely demanding relation. This leads to an immediate challenge. The …

Abstract Knowledge ascriptions depend on so-called non-traditional factors. For instance,
we become less inclined to ascribe knowledge when it's important to be right, or once we …

In this response to Edouard Machery's comments on On Folk Epistemology, I address his
methodological challenges, the first of which concerns cross-cultural and interpersonal …

In this response to Kate Nolfi's comments on On Folk Epistemology, I defend the book's
arguments in favor of strict purist invariantism and against pragmatic encroachment. I first …