In this paper we report on a significant research project undertaken to design, implement
and evaluate explainable decision-support tools for deciding legal cases. We provide a …

The starting point is the idea that we need a'toolbox', not fixed methodological guidelines,
but a lot of published, however largely unnoticed, research offering various approaches …

Contemporary democracies have granted an expansive amount of power to unelected
judges that sit in constitutional or supreme courts. This power shift has never been easily …

Учебник включает как традиционные темы по курсу «Проблемы теории государства и
права», так и целый ряд других, выходящих за рамки обычной общевузовской …

Ao longo dos últimos 12 anos, as ideias contidas desde a primeira edição desta obra foram
submetidas ao teste do tempo pela prática e evolução do Direito. Acredita-se que resistiram …

La importancia del precedente y la jurisprudencia en los ordenamientos jurídicos modernos
no garantiza que éstos siempre sean utilizados de forma idónea. A través de un análisis del …

This paper uses a simple dynamic model to describe the evolution of judicial decision
making in civil law systems. Unlike the common law systems, civil law jurisdictions do not …

Arguments from precedent and analogy are two central forms of reasoning found in many
legal systems, especially 'Common Law'systems such as those in England and the United …

Analytical jurisprudence has been mostly silent on the role of precedent in legal
adjudication. What is the content of a judge's precedent ideology, or the rule of precedent …

The Law and Philosophy Library, which has been in existence since 1985, aims to publish
cutting edge works in the philosophy of law, and has a special history of publishing books …