I argue that explanations of doxastic transparency which go via an appeal to an aim or norm
of belief are problematic. I offer a new explanation which appeals to a biological function of …

We argue that the most plausible characterisation of the norm of truth—it is permissible to
believe that p if and only if p is true—is unable to explain Transparency in doxastic …

Many have argued that there are specifically epistemic duties that we have relating to what
we believe. Here I construct and consider arguments for this philosophical dogma. First I …

According to the pragmatic hypothesis testing theory, how much evidence we require before
we believe something varies depending on the expected costs of falsely believing and …

Sažetak In this paper I consider the project of offering an evolutionary debunking
explanation for transparency in doxastic deliberation. I examine Nicole Dular and Nikki …

Many agree that one cannot consciously form a belief just because one wants to. And many
also agree this is a puzzling component of our conscious belief-forming processes. I will look …

In this paper, I defend teleological theories of belief against the exclusivity objection. I argue
that despite the exclusive influence of truth in doxastic deliberation, multiple epistemic aims …

This thesis is concerned with self-ascriptive belief. I argue that one's lower-order belief can
be fixed from the reflective level. One reasons about whether p is the case and it is on the …

In this paper I consider the project of offering an evolutionary debunking explanation for
transparency in doxastic deliberation. I examine Nicole Dular and Nikki Fortier's (2021) …

Ce mémoire, qui appartient au domaine de l'éthique de la croyance, un champ d'enquête
philosophique situé au confluent de la philosophie de l'esprit, de l'épistémologie et de …