Much economic advice is bogus quantification, warn two leading experts in this essential
book, now with a preface on COVID-19. Invented numbers offer a false sense of security; we …

Antitrust's rule of reason was born out of a thirty-year Supreme Court debate concerning the
legality of multi-firm restraints on competition. By the late 1920s the basic contours of the rule …

Within legal scholarship there is a tendency to use (perhaps overuse)“paradigm shift” in
ways far removed from the process famously described by Thomas Kuhn. Within the field of …

Forensic pattern analysis requires examiners to compare the patterns of items such as
fingerprints or tool marks to assess whether they have a common source. This article uses …

PROBABILITY, PRESUMPTIONS AND EVIDENTIARY BURDENS IN ANTITRUST ANALYSIS:
REVITALIZING THE RULE OF REASON FOR EXCLUSIONARY CONDUC Page 1 ARTICLE …

Legal factfinding, like most real life decision-making, involves decision under uncertainty.'
Consequently, the legal system has adopted a set of decision rules to instruct judges and …

Suppose, in the near future, that police start using an algorithmic tool-the Contraband
Detector-to locate residences likely to contain illegal weapons. When the tool was first …

For several decades, a variety of paradoxes have fascinated and frustrated legal scholars
and courts discussing evidence, procedure, and legalproof These paradoxes concern …

Long after the conclusion of the 2016 presidential election in the United States, the story of
Russian hacking has lived on. Public reports of Russian interference with the election first …

The legal concept of evidence is neither static nor universal. Medieval understandings of
evidence in the age of trial by ordeal would be quite alien to modern sensibilities (Ho 2003 …