[图书][B] The behavior of federal judges: a theoretical and empirical study of rational choice

L Epstein, WM Landes, RA Posner - 2012 - degruyter.com
I often say that when you can mea sure what you are speaking about, and express it in
numbers, you know some thing about it; but when you cannot mea sure it, when you cannot …

Some thoughts on the study of judicial behavior

L Epstein - Wm. & Mary L. Rev., 2015 - HeinOnline
Back in the 1940s the political scientist C. Herman Pritchett began tallying the votes and
opinions of Supreme Court Justices. His goal was to use data to test the hypothesis that the …

The use of amicus briefs

PM Collins Jr - Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 2018 - annualreviews.org
Judicial decisions play an important role in shaping public policy. Recognizing this, interest
groups and other entities lobby judges in an attempt to translate their policy preferences into …

Deference Mistakes

JS Masur, LL Ouellette - U. Chi. L. Rev., 2015 - HeinOnline
Deference Mistakes Page 1 Deference Mistakes Jonathan S. Masurt & Lisa Larrimore
Ouellettett This Article begins with what should seem a relatively straightforward prop- osition …

[图书][B] The ghostwriters: lawyers and the politics behind the judicial construction of Europe

T Pavone - 2022 - books.google.com
The European Union is often depicted as a cradle of judicial activism and a polity built by
courts. Tommaso Pavone shows how this judge-centric narrative conceals a crucial arena …

Structure matters: The impact of court structure on the Indian and US Supreme Courts

N Robinson - The American Journal of Comparative Law, 2013 - academic.oup.com
Abstract The US Supreme Court sits as a unified bench of nine justices. The Indian Supreme
Court sits in panels, and can have up to thirtyone justices. This Article uses the divergent …

United/States: A Revolutionary History of American Statehood

C Green - Michigan Law Review, 2020 - JSTOR
Where did states come from? Almost everyone thinks that states descended immediately,
originally, and directly from British colonies, while only afterward joining together as the …

Beyond mere presence: gender norms in oral arguments at the US Supreme Court

SA Gleason - Political Research Quarterly, 2020 - journals.sagepub.com
Women are less successful than their male counterparts at Supreme Court oral arguments
under certain circumstances. However, existing work relies on mere presence rather than on …

Triangulating judicial responsiveness: automated content analysis, judicial opinions, and the methodology of legal scholarship

CM Oldfather, JP Bockhorst, BP Dimmer - Fla. L. Rev., 2012 - HeinOnline
The increasing availability of digital versions of court documents, coupled with increases in
the power and sophistication of computational methods of textual analysis, promises to …

I Can't See You; Can You Hear Me? Gender Norms and Context During In-Person and Teleconference US Supreme Court Oral Arguments

SA Gleason - Politics & Gender, 2024 - cambridge.org
Female attorneys at the US Supreme Court are less successful than male attorneys under
some conditions because of gender norms, implicit expectations about how men and …