This book is a revised version of my dissertation'DiaLaw-on legal th justification and dialog
games' that I defended on June 5 1998 at the Universiteit Maastricht. The chapters 1, 4 & 5 …

This paper announces the creation and public availability of a dataset of annotated
decisions adjudicating claims by military veterans for disability compensation in the United …

Legal argument is typically backed by two kinds of sources: cases and rules. In much AI &
Law research, the formalization of arguments, rules and cases has been investigated. In this …

Solving the first of these two drawbacks has led to a new graphical representation of the
arguments, in which argument attacks are shown, and to a change in the argumentation …

In all ODR-procedures, Information Technology (IT) is used. Artificial Intelligence (AI)
applications are a subset of IT applications and add benefit either by using 'intelligent …

This paper investigates whether current nonmonotonic logics are suitable for formalising the
defeasibility of legal reasoning. It does so by studying the role of burden of proof in legal …

This paper provides a formal description of two legal domains. In addition, we describe the
generation of various artificial datasets from these domains and explain the use of these …

This paper introduces the ArguMed-system. It is an example of a system for computer-
mediated defeasible argumentation, a new trend in the field of defeasible argumentation. In …

Legal argumentation can be modeled using logic, but in this chapter it is claimed that logic
alone does not suffice. A model should also take the rhetoric nature of legal argumentation …

In this short paper we introduce some novel arguments based on legal cases represented
as sets of dimensions. Although there has been much work on arguments based on factors …