ARTICLES Page 1 ARTICLES The Arbitration-Litigation Paradox Pamela K Bookman* The
Supreme Court's interpretation of the Federal Arbitration Act is universally touted as favoring …

Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction—but only in part. A federal court's subject-
matter jurisdiction is limited by the Constitution; its territorial, personal jurisdiction is not …

Following a more-than-twenty year hiatus, personal jurisdiction cases 1 are again front and
center on the US Supreme Court's docket. 2 Over the last eight years, the Court has clarified …

The number of transnational corporations-including parent companies and subsidiaries-has
exploded over the last forty years, which has led to a correlating rise of corporate violations …

In Morrison v. National Australia Bank, the US Supreme Court discarded sixty years of
jurisprudence governing whether US law would apply beyond US borders. 1 The Court did …

The Roberts Court's six decisions imposing new restrictions on personal jurisdiction'have
attracted much critical attention? Scholars have questioned the coherence of the Court's …

State sovereignty, once seemingly sidelined in personal jurisdiction analysis, has returned
with a vengeance. Driven by the idea that states must not offend rival states in their …

Reflecting on the Fourth Restatement of the Foreign Relations Law, these essays provide a
comprehensive survey of the most significant issues in contemporary US foreign relations …

ABSTRACT The Supreme Court's recent decisions on personal jurisdiction, including its
2021 decision in Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eighth Judicial District Court, have all focused …

This repackaging of jurisdictional power is not costless, but neither is it entirely wasteful. In
fact, it illustrates that the jurisdictional power of US courts is built on inter-branch dialogue …