Based on an empirical study of a research team in natural science, the author argues that
collaborating scientists do not trust each other completely. Due to the inherent …

Social studies of interdisciplinary science investigate how scientific collaborations approach
complex challenges that require multiple disciplinary perspectives. In order for collaborators …

An analysis of group justification enables us to understand what it means to say that a
research group is justified in making a claim on the basis of evidence. I defend Frederick …

William Keith and William Rehg approaches tend to resist this separation (eg, dialogical
models of conversational arguments, rhetorical approaches). In the sciences, at any rate …

This paper examines the role of evidential considerations in relation to pragmatic concerns
in statements of group belief, focusing on scientific collaborations that are constituted in part …

Empirical insights have proven fruitful for the advancement of Philosophy of Science, but the
integration of philosophical concepts and qualitative empirical data poses considerable …

Amidst long-running debates within the field, high energy physics (HEP) has adopted a
statistical methodology that primarily employs standard frequentist techniques such as …

In the last few decades, there has been an increasing use of, and demand for, high-quality
evidence among decision makers in international development. Evidence from research …

The organization of cutting-edge HEP laboratories has evolved in the intersection of
academia, state agencies, and industry. Exponentially ever-larger and more complex …

This dissertation primarily concerns how scientific collaborations function, how scientists
know together, and how we ought to think about collective justification and collective …