The cross-cultural validity of feigning instruments and cut-scores is a critical concern for
forensic mental health clinicians. This systematic review evaluated feigning classification …

Abstract The Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms (SIRS; Rogers, Bagby, & Dickens,
1992) is often touted as the gold standard of measures of feigning. This label likely arises in …

Offers guidance on the selection of appropriate measures for Axis I disorders, Axis II
disorders, and specialized syndromes, marshalling data on reliability, validity, and clinical …

Insanity evaluations represent the most challenging and complex evaluations in forensic
psychology and psychiatry. Mental health and legal professionals involved in insanity cases …

The validity of most psychological measures is predicated on the cardinal assumption that
evaluatees are responding in a forthright manner and putting forth a sincere effort. Is this …

A cornerstone of forensic assessments involves the assessment of response styles,
including feigning and malingering. As a forensic relevant instrument (FRI), the Minnesota …

This article describes the development of the Inventory of Problems–29 (IOP–29), a new,
short, paper-and-pencil, self-administered measure of feigned mental and cognitive …

The current study examined the utility of the recently released Minnesota Multiphasic
Personality Inventory—2 Restructured Form (MMPI–2-RF; Ben-Porath & Tellegen, 2008) …

The assessment of malingering is a fundamental component of forensic evaluations that
should be considered with each referral. In systematizing the evaluation of malingering, one …

A major component of this chapter involves the systematic examination of five basic
research designs that are often applied to the study of response styles. For the sake of …