This article explores how a procedural approach in the case law of the ECtHR combines
subsidiarity and progressive development of international obligations. Rather than …

El libro que presentamos tiene como objeto revisitar el examen de proporcionalidad,
tomando como objeto de reflexión crítica la jurisprudencia de las cortes de América Latina …

While the role of comparative law in the courts was previously only an exception, foreign
sources are now increasingly becoming a source of law in regular use in supreme and …

Настоящая статья представляет собой анализ проблемы соразмерности полного
конституционного запрета заключённым голосовать в Российской федерации. поводом …

This article explores the contestability of European consensus and its significance for the
legitimacy of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). The ECtHR's combined …

This Article will suggest that judges of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) take
into account both legal and non-legal considerations when deciding" hard" cases. This …

Este trabajo analiza críticamente una constelación argumentativa central en el TEDH que
combina inexistencia de consenso europeo con amplio margen de apreciación al Estado …

Under the influence of the global spread of human rights, legal disputes are increasingly
framed in human rights terms. Parties to a legal dispute can often invoke human rights …

In 1983, Ireland became the first country in the world to constitutionalize" fetal rights."'The 8th
Amendment to the Irish Constitution, passed by a referendum of the People, resulted in …

Anyone with even a passing interest in the politics of reproductive rights will know that
abortion is a serious flashpoint in Irish politics. For decades, the questions of whether, how …