Reviews 55 studies in which self-evaluations of ability were compared with measures of
performance to show a low mean validity coefficient (mean r=. 29) with high variability (SD …

The most ubiquitous method of performance appraisal is rating. Ratings, however, have
been shown to be prone to various types of systematic and random error. Studies relating to …

Results of this field study of 597 employees demonstrate the importance of extra-role
behavior in explaining employee performance over a six-month period. Supervisors, peers …

Employability is a critical requirement for enabling both sustained competitive advantage at
the firm level and career success at the individual level. We propose a competence‐based …

Reviews of self–supervisor, self–peer, and peer–supervisor ratings have generally
concluded that there is at best a modest correlation between different rating sources …

Individuals differ on multiple aspects of their job-role behavior; criteria are measures that
attempt to capture these differences. Measures of criteria are used by several constituencies …

Reviews research on the relationship between self-perceptions and evaluations from other
people. Studies of naturalistic interactions indicate that people's self-perceptions agree …

The purpose of this investigation was to examine the psychometric properties (interrater
reliabilities within source and correlations between sources) of subordinate, supervisor …

This study examined the effects of executive coaching on multisource feedback over time.
Participants were 1,361 senior managers who received multisource feedback; 404 of these …

This meta-analysis explores agreement in self-and supervisory ratings of job performance
(k= 128 independent samples). It suggests a 3-stage model of the rating process and …