Normativism in the theory of meaning and content is the view that linguistic meaning and/or
intentional content are essentially normative. As both normativity and its essentiality to …

This paper defends the view that in a certain sense evidence is normative. Neither a bit of
evidence nor the fact that it is evidence for a certain proposition is a normative fact, but it is …

Many have argued that there are specifically epistemic duties that we have relating to what
we believe. Here I construct and consider arguments for this philosophical dogma. First I …

Normativists argue that the mind is essentially normative and any adequate account of our
mental attitudes must involve normative terms and judgments. In particular, one brand of …

The computational approach to psychiatric disorders, including delusions, promises
explanation and treatment. Here, we argue that an information processing approach might …

That it can explain the phenomenon of transparency, namely the fact that if you resolve
whether p, you have thereby resolved whether to believe that p, was originally put forward …

In this paper, I examine a kind of delusion in which the patients judge that their occurrent
thoughts are false and try to abandon them precisely because they are false, but fail to do …

Sažetak In this paper I consider the project of offering an evolutionary debunking
explanation for transparency in doxastic deliberation. I examine Nicole Dular and Nikki …

Many agree that one cannot consciously form a belief just because one wants to. And many
also agree this is a puzzling component of our conscious belief-forming processes. I will look …

In my dissertation, I defend an argument for the claim that our concept of belief has an
irreducible normative component to the effect that a belief is good if its content is true and …