The moral psychology of artificial intelligence

A Ladak, S Loughnan, M Wilks - Current Directions in …, 2024 - journals.sagepub.com
Artificial intelligences (AIs), although often perceived as mere tools, have increasingly
advanced cognitive and social capacities. In response, psychologists are studying people's …

Правовое регулирование искусственного интеллекта

ИА Филипова - 2022 - elibrary.ru
Искусственный интеллект выступает важнейшим элементом Четвертой
промышленной революции. Его быстрое развитие и расширяющееся использование …

The conflict between explainable and accountable decision-making algorithms

G Lima, N Grgić-Hlača, JK Jeong, M Cha - Proceedings of the 2022 ACM …, 2022 - dl.acm.org
Decision-making algorithms are being used in important decisions, such as who should be
enrolled in health care programs and be hired. Even though these systems are currently …

Human and machine drivers: sharing control, sharing responsibility

S Zhai, L Wang, P Liu - Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2023 - Elsevier
Abstract Machines are empowered with ever-increasing agency and decision-making
authority to augment or even replace humans in various settings, making responsibility …

Blaming humans and machines: What shapes people's reactions to algorithmic harm

G Lima, N Grgić-Hlača, M Cha - … of the 2023 CHI conference on human …, 2023 - dl.acm.org
Artificial intelligence (AI) systems can cause harm to people. This research examines how
individuals react to such harm through the lens of blame. Building upon research suggesting …

When both human and machine drivers make mistakes: Whom to blame?

S Zhai, S Gao, L Wang, P Liu - Transportation research part A: policy and …, 2023 - Elsevier
The advent of automated and algorithmic technology requires people to consider them when
assigning responsibility for something going wrong. We focus on a focal question: who or …

Who Should Pay When Machines Cause Harm? Laypeople's Expectations of Legal Damages for Machine-Caused Harm

G Lima, N Grgic-Hlaca, JK Jeong, M Cha - Proceedings of the 2023 ACM …, 2023 - dl.acm.org
The question of who should be held responsible when machines cause harm in high-risk
environments is open to debate. Empirical research examining laypeople's opinions has …

Responsibility gap or responsibility shift? The attribution of criminal responsibility in human–machine interaction

M Simmler - Information, Communication & Society, 2024 - Taylor & Francis
The prevalence of automation and advent of intelligent machines have created new
constellations in which the attribution of criminal responsibility is complicated. Automation …

Interpreting ordinary uses of psychological and moral terms in the AI domain

H Noh - Synthese, 2023 - Springer
Intuitively, proper referential extensions of psychological and moral terms exclude artifacts.
Yet ordinary speakers commonly treat AI robots as moral patients and use psychological …

[HTML][HTML] Atypical responses of job candidates in chatbot job interviews and their possible triggers

H Řepová, P Král, J Zouhar - Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial …, 2024 - Elsevier
Recruiters have observed increased verbal abuse and other non-standard behavior in
chatbot job interviews. However, current knowledge about such behavior, which we term …