Recent DNA exonerations have shed light on the problem that people sometimes confess to
crimes they did not commit. Drawing on police practices, laws concerning the admissibility of …

Miranda's' familiar regime of warnings and waivers was intended to afford custodial suspects
an informed and unfettered choice between speech and silence and, at the same time …

By law, before interrrogating a suspect who is in custody, the police should inform them of
their Miranda rights—the rights against self-incrimination and to an attorney. When a suspect …

Individuals with a diagnosis of fetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD) experience a range of
physical, cognitive, and behavioral deficits thought to interfere with their ability to …

This study examined juvenile justice-involved youths' understanding and appreciation of the
Miranda warnings' rights to silence and legal counsel using the Miranda Rights …

The current article presents a series of commentaries on urgent issues and prospects in
reforming interrogation practices in Canada and the United States. Researchers and …

The purpose of the Miranda rights in the USA is to ensure that suspects know their
fundamental rights under the law, yet even native speakers of English do not always …

Abstract Miranda v. Arizona (384 US 436, 1966) required that suspects be explicitly warned
of the right to avoid self-incrimination and the right to legal representation. This research was …

Forensic mental health assessment (FMHA) has grown into a specialization informed by
research and professional guidelines. This series presents up-to-date information on the …

This research examined whether the protections afforded by Miranda are compromised by
two situational factors that may be present during the Miranda administration process. The …