Replication—an important, uncommon, and misunderstood practice—is gaining
appreciation in psychology. Achieving replicability is important for making research …

Replicability is widely taken to ground the epistemic authority of science. However, in recent
years, important published findings in the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences have …

There are long-standing concerns that peer review, which is foundational to scientific
institutions like journals and funding agencies, favors conservative ideas over novel ones …

How should we reason in science? Jan Sprenger and Stephan Hartmann offer a refreshing
take on classical topics in philosophy of science, using a single key concept to explain and …

A heated debate surrounds the significance of reproducibility as an indicator for research
quality and reliability, with many commentators linking a “crisis of reproducibility” to the rise …

Prepublication peer review should be abolished. We consider the effects that such a change
will have on the social structure of science, paying particular attention to the changed …

The replication (replicability, reproducibility) crisis in social psychology and clinical medicine
arises from the fact that many apparently well-confirmed experimental results are …

Current debates about the replication crisis in psychology take it for granted that direct
replication is valuable, largely focusing on its role in uncovering questionable statistical …

In the relentless pursuit of scientific advancement, comprehending the profound impact and
innovation nature inherent in funded research projects assumes paramount significance. To …

“Dr Charlotte R. Pennington has pulled off a remarkable trifecta of being clear, concise, and
comprehensive in covering the origins of the open science movement and practical advice …