International courts and tribunals are increasingly asked to pass judgment on matters that
are traditionally considered to fall within the domestic jurisdiction of States. Especially in the …

The principle of the religious-ideological neutrality of the State and the doctrine of the margin
of appreciation are two of the criteria most frequently used by the European Court of Human …

L'acceptabilité des arrêts de la Cour européenne des droits de l'homme par les États
membres du Conseil de l'Europe constitue un défi contemporain majeur pour les juges de …

This monograph is based on a PhD thesis awarded by National and Kapodistrian University
of Athens (School of Law) in December 2019. It reflects the law and jurisprudence as they …

This research is part of the discussion about the relationship between international judges
and national authorities and their dispute for the last word. Specifically, it covers the …

In ES v. Austria, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that a criminal conviction for
making disparaging comments about the Prophet Muhammad, intimating in particular that …

International adjudicators are more and more often requested to pass judgement on matters
that are traditionally considered to fall within the domestic jurisdiction of States. 1 Especially …

This thesis examines the European Court of Human Right's approach to the large-scale
human rights crisis in Turkey, in particular the post-coup era. Despite the centralization of the …