Clinical efficacy of resin-based direct posterior restorations and glass-ionomer restorations–An updated meta-analysis of clinical outcome parameters

SD Heintze, AD Loguercio, TA Hanzen, A Reis… - Dental Materials, 2022 - Elsevier
Objective The present review is an update of a systematic review that has been published in
2012. Meanwhile, many new clinical trials on resin composites had been published. New …

[HTML][HTML] The preventive effect of glass ionomer cement restorations on secondary caries formation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

KX Ge, R Quock, CH Chu, OY Yu - Dental Materials, 2023 - Elsevier
Objective The objective is to compare the preventive effect on secondary caries of glass
ionomer cement (GIC) restorations with amalgam or resin-composite restorations. Methods …

Five-year clinical evaluation of a universal adhesive: a randomized double-blind trial

T de Paris Matos, J Perdigao, E De Paula, F Coppla… - Dental Materials, 2020 - Elsevier
Objective To evaluate the five-year clinical performance of Scotchbond Universal Adhesive
(SU; 3M Oral Care, St. Paul, MN, USA) in non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) using two …

Revised FDI criteria for evaluating direct and indirect dental restorations—recommendations for its clinical use, interpretation, and reporting

R Hickel, S Mesinger, N Opdam, B Loomans… - Clinical oral …, 2023 - Springer
Objectives The FDI criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect dental restorations were
first published in 2007 and updated in 2010. Meanwhile, their scientific use increased …

Randomized 36-month follow-up of posterior bulk-filled resin composite restorations

AD Loguercio, M Rezende, MF Gutierrez, TF Costa… - Journal of dentistry, 2019 - Elsevier
Objective The aim of this double blind, randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the 36-
month clinical performance of the layering technique (incremental [IF] vs. bulk-fill [BF]) in …

Longevity of direct diastema closure and recontouring restorations with resin composites in maxillary anterior teeth: A 4‐year clinical evaluation

B Korkut, C Türkmen - Journal of Esthetic and Restorative …, 2021 - Wiley Online Library
Objectives To evaluate the clinical performance of resin composite restorations and to
investigate causes of failure. Materials and Methods The longevity of 216 restorations in 53 …

[HTML][HTML] Randomized clinical split-mouth study on a novel self-adhesive bulk-fill restorative vs. a conventional bulk-fill composite for restoration of class II cavities …

F Cieplik, KA Hiller, W Buchalla, M Federlin… - Journal of Dentistry, 2022 - Elsevier
Objectives This randomized prospective split-mouth study evaluated the clinical
performance of a novel, tooth-colored, self-adhesive bulk-fill restorative (SABF, 3M) for …

5-year clinical performance of posterior bulk-filled resin composite restorations: a double-blind randomized controlled trial

AD Loguercio, R Ñaupari-Villasante, MF Gutierrez… - Dental Materials, 2023 - Elsevier
Objectives The aim of this double-blind, and randomized controlled clinical trial was to
evaluate the 5-year clinical performance of posterior resin composite restorations placed …

One-year clinical evaluation of bulk-fill flowable vs. regular nanofilled composite in non-carious cervical lesions

GD Canali, SA Ignácio, RN Rached… - Clinical oral investigations, 2019 - Springer
Objective The aim of this double-blind, randomized trial was to evaluate the 1-year clinical
performance of a bulk-fill flowable and a regular nanofilled composite in non-carious …

Five-year clinical evaluation of universal adhesive applied following different bonding techniques: A randomized multicenter clinical trial

R Ñaupari-Villasante, TP Matos, EG de Albuquerque… - Dental Materials, 2023 - Elsevier
Objectives To evaluate the clinical performance of a universal adhesive system (Futurabond
U, Voco) when applied following different adhesive strategies in non-carious cervical lesions …