In this paper I focus on the fallacy known as Complex Question or Many Questions. After a
brief introduction, in Sect. 2 I highlight its pragmatic dimension, and in Sect. 3 its dialectical …

The present chapter aims at exploring and clarifying the contributions made from the ranks
of argumentation theorists to account for abductive-type forms of offering reasons for a …

Following and extending Searle's speech act theory, both Pragma-Dialectics and the
Linguistic Normative Model of Argumentation characterize argumentation as an illocutionary …

Sažetak Rad pruža pregled suvremene teorije argumentacije, akademske discipline
oblikovane u drugoj polovici dvadesetoga stoljeća, fokusirajući se na povijesne utjecaje …

Within the epistemological approach to Argumentation Theory, there are two opposing views
on what a theory of argumentation should look like. On the one hand, there are those …

This work analyses the speech-act of arguing as proposed by Linguistic Normative Model of
Argumentation (LNMA) with the help of diagrams, examples and basic formalization …

This paper addresses the complex issue of the nature of speech acts of arguing. It aims to
discuss this question from a comparative perspective, by looking at the lessons that …

Many standard definitions of 'argument'that recognise an ambiguity between its active and
objective senses seek to subsume these in various ways into a single, composite whole …

[ES] La mediación en conflictos es una metodología para la resolución pacífica de las
disputas interpersonales. Actualmente, la mediación en España se ha profesionalizado e …

El objetivo de este trabajo es, por un lado, explicar por qué el discurso sobre los Derechos
Humanos permite cierto tipo de estrategias políticas insidiosas recientemente denunciadas …