The efficacy and safety of articaine versus lignocaine in dental treatments: a meta-analysis

V Katyal - Journal of dentistry, 2010 - Elsevier
OBJECTIVES: Although articaine has been recommended for providing an improved local
anaesthetic effect in patients presenting for dental treatments, a relevant meta-analysis has …

Articaine: a review of the literature

KE Yapp, MS Hopcraft, P Parashos - British dental journal, 2011 - nature.com
Articaine is one of the most recent local anaesthetic drugs made available to dentists
worldwide. Anecdotal reports advocate its superiority over other common local anaesthetic …

Update on the use of corticosteroids in third molar surgery: systematic review of the literature

FJ Herrera-Briones, EP Sánchez, CR Botella… - Oral surgery, Oral …, 2013 - Elsevier
Objectives Third molar extraction produces inflammation, pain, and trismus, and different
pharmacologic therapies have been evaluated for the minimization of postsurgical …

Injectable local anaesthetic agents for dental anaesthesia

G St George, A Morgan, J Meechan… - Cochrane Database …, 2018 - cochranelibrary.com
Background Pain during dental treatment, which is a common fear of patients, can be
controlled successfully by local anaesthetic. Several different local anaesthetic formulations …

Efficacy of 4% Articaine and 2% Lidocaine: A clinical study

DH Kambalimath, RS Dolas, HV Kambalimath… - Journal of maxillofacial …, 2013 - Springer
Objectives This study was undertaken to compare the anesthetic properties of 4% Articaine
hydrochloride and 2% Lidocaine both with 1: 100,000 epinephrine for mandibular inferior …

Epinephrine concentration (1: 100,000 or 1: 200,000) does not affect the clinical efficacy of 4% articaine for lower third molar removal: a double-blind, randomized …

CF Santos, KCS Modena, FPM Giglio, VT Sakai… - Journal of oral and …, 2007 - Elsevier
PURPOSE: This study compared the use of 4% articaine in association with 1: 100,000 (10
μg/mL; A100) or 1: 200,000 (5 μg/mL; A200) epinephrine in lower third molar removal …

Evidence-based oral and maxillofacial surgery

PA Kyzas - Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2008 - Elsevier
PURPOSE: The amount and quality of research evidence in oral and maxillofacial surgery
(OMFS) journals have never been evaluated. The current study aims to empirically assess …

A comparison of the clinical anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine and 0.5% bupivacaine (both with 1: 200,000 epinephrine) for lower third molar removal

LVL Gregorio, FPM Giglio, VT Sakai… - Oral Surgery, Oral …, 2008 - Elsevier
OBJECTIVE: This study compared the clinical efficacy of 4% articaine (A200) and 0.5%
bupivacaine (B200), both with 1: 200,000 epinephrine, for lower third molar removal. STUDY …

Analgesic and anti-inflammatory dose–response relationship of 7.5 and 15 mg meloxicam after lower third molar removal: a double-blind, randomized, crossover …

AM Calvo, VT Sakai, FPM Giglio, KCS Modena… - International journal of …, 2007 - Elsevier
Fifty patients were scheduled to undergo removal of symmetrically positioned lower third
molars in two separate appointments. Meloxicam 7.5 or 15mg was once daily administered …

[HTML][HTML] Are antibiotics necessary after lower third molar removal?

AM Calvo, DT Brozoski, FPM Giglio… - Oral surgery, oral …, 2012 - Elsevier
OBJECTIVE: Patients (n= 110) free of antibiotics, operated on by 3 surgeons ranging in
clinical experiences, were evaluated for infection. STUDY DESIGN: In the preoperative …