A committee makes a decision on a project on behalf of “the public.” Members of the
committee agree on the a priori value of the project, and hold additional private information …

We contend that, with a suitably broad notion of rationality and a diverse set of motivations,
the game‐theoretic tradition is particularly well suited for generating insights about effects of …

Through this essay and its accompanying commentaries, we offer a focal point for a wide‐
ranging dialogue about how those with conflict‐related expertise might do more to contribute …

We present a game-theoretic model of the social dynamics of belief change in which the
(relevant) logically non-omniscient audience becomes convinced that the speakers' …

A theory of deliberation must provide a plausible account both of individuals' choices to
speak or to listen and of how they reinterpret their own views in the aftermath of deliberation …

Ideal deliberative democracy seeks to employ unbiased moderators. Yet, a large literature in
the field of mediation suggests the elusiveness of perfect neutrality. Our study thus …

I develop a model of the market for news in which consumers and reporters both
ideologically misinterpret information and have biased beliefs about the extent to which …

This book brings together philosophers to investigate the nature and normativity of group
disagreement. Debates in the epistemology of disagreement have mainly been concerned …

Political parties sometimes adopt unpopular positions that condemn them to electoral defeat.
This phenomenon is usually ascribed to expressive motives—namely, parties' desire to …

This paper examines inference and attribution in a simple and ubiquitous strategic situation:
a voter is faced with discerning whether a leader worked on his or her behalf after observing …