In recent years, both legal scholars and the American public have become aware that something is not quite right with the Supreme Court's Eighth Amendment jurisprudence …
In recent years, the use of economic sanctions-statutory fines, surcharges, administrative fees, and restitution-has exploded in courts across the country. Economic sanctions are …
Death is different, according to the Supreme Court.'And the Court is hardly guilty of understatement. Its capital sentencing jurisprudence departs from its noncapital sentencing …
Budget constraints, bipartisan desire to address mass incarceration, and the COVID-19 crisis in prisons have triggered state and federal officials to seek alternatives to …
From the ancient origins of Just War doctrine to utilitarian and retributive theories of punishment, concepts of proportionality have long been an instrumental part of the rule of …
The Supreme Court's proportionality jurisprudence under the Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause appears to be undergoing a kind of renaissance. Since 2002, the Court …
This Article draws a distinction between two kinds of plea bargain-ing. In some instances, the practice of plea bargaining leads to what this Article calls de facto unilateral adjudication …
This Article examines proportionality as a constitutional limitation on the power to punish. In the criminal context, proportionality is often mischaracterized as a specifically penological …
J Bronsteen, C Buccafusco, J Masur - The University of Chicago Law Review, 2009 - JSTOR
This Article continues our project of applying new findings in the behavioral psychology of human happiness to some of the most deeply analyzed questions in law. When a state …